Dear friends,
Thank you very much reading this.I come to you with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe.
First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe . Then, I will say a few things about Islam. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem . The Europe you know is changing. You have probably seen the landmarks. But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from tourist destinations, there is another world. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration. All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighbourhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well.
It's the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighbourhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe . These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighbourhood by neighbourhood, city by city. There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule. Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam , Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighbourhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities. In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims.
Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halals food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear 'whore, whore'. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin. In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin. The history of the Holocaust can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity. In England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighbourhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan.
Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya , Israel. I could go on forever with stories about Islamization like this. A total of fifty four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.
Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Centre reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favour of a worldwide caliphate. Muslims demand what they call 'respect'. And this is how we give them respect. We have Muslim official state holidays. The Christian-Democratic attorney general is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. There are cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey in the Netherlands Parliament. Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behaviour, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. I call the perpetrators 'settlers'. Because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers. Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighbourhoods, their cities, their countries. Moreover, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored in these places.
The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behaviour is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages - at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad.
Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means 'submission'. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.
Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam ' the most retrograde force in the world', and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor.
I support Israel . First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defence. This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam's territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines , Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan , Lebanon , and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.
The war against Israel is not a war against Israel . It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel , Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.
Many in Europe and America argue in favour of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behaviour, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel , they can get everything. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a 'right-wing extremists' or 'racists'. In the Netherlands , 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat. Yet there is a danger greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America - as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome , Athens and Jerusalem.
My friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. Our generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe , American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. Our generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to our children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so. We have to take the necessary action now to stop this Islamic stupidity from destroying the free world that we know.
The proof that this is happening right now in our country is at Ft Hood 10 days ago. That was not a soldier loyal to our country, he never was. He was a MUSLIM FIRST and a PALESTINIAN second. Even though he was born in Virginia and raised there he claimed Palestinian Nationality and when he had the opportunity he show just where his loyalties lie he killed a dozen of our soldiers. Now our liberal biased media is afraid to say what it really is; a radical Muslim infiltrator that compromised our military and destroyed some of the trust the each of us as soldiers MUST have in order to fight next to one another. Can any of us feel 100% comfortable going into harms way with a Muslim by our side when it is a Muslim that they are expected to defend us against when the bullets start to fly? Can any of us feel safe living next to a Muslim Family in our neighborhoods or with a Muslim student in school next to our children? This incident at Ft Hood is not the end of this, nor is it a one time thing. It is only another in a long line of events driven by the same ideology and it will continue and grow if we do not stop it.
the time for appeasement is over! we must take back what is ours if we want to keep it. This is the greatest threat to the world since Hitler and they want the same things. Total domination and death to the Jews and all who do not believe in Allah. Let your voices be heard and demand from your congressmen that they take a stand against this threat in congress or we will be fighting this threat in our streets and schools and malls across our country.
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Welcome to the death of Democracy and Capitalism!!
Why do I think that we may be near the end of Democracy and Capitalism?? Well let's take a look at recent events and then you decide.
1. There was a supposed housing crisis, that was actually caused by people living beyond there means and banks allowing them to do it. Of course that was dictated by Barney Franks and the House Finance Committee that told the banks they have to give HALF of their housing loans to Low Income Families.
That would not have done it if that were all that had happened. But in order to make that happen "The Barney SHOW" and the housing lenders got creative and decided to offer a new deal, the "sub-prime loan". this means that you buy a house that you normally couldn't afford but the banks are gonna help you out.
How? you only have to pay 2 or 3 percent interest per month on that loan (for the first five years that is) after that you have to pay that mortgage at 7.5 -9 percent in some cases in order to make up the difference that you were not paying for that first five years. Oh Yeah, and while you weren't PAYING that interest in the beginning, it was still accumulating.
So naturally when these people that bought all of these homes under this plan had to face the music and start paying a mortgage that had doubled or more OVER NIGHT they couldn't and had to sell or get foreclosed. That caused the banks to move to the edge of collapse, but only the ones that took part in that deal. To include the banks that traded and sold those mortgages like stock when they new that those loans were RADIOACTIVE to start with.
In most of those cases the banks knew that the borrower was not going to be able to afford that house even after five years and some "FORE CASTED RAISES" that might come. They did it anyway, all at the behest of the "Barney Show". President Bush, Senator McCaine , Ben Bernake and others all tried to tell MR FRANKS that the banking industry and housing market in particular needed to be better regulated because of what was happening and what was coming.
MR FRANKS said "the housing market is doing well, there is no problem. why would I listen you, you're trying to scare the people into believing the sky is falling." And he did nothing to stop it. Then when it happened, he blamed President Bush and the Republicans in office.
But don't worry, here comes the LIBERALS (SOCIALISTS) to save the day. With control of congress and backing from the white house (PRES BUSH) they spent 750 BILLION dollars to prop up these banks that had done this instead of letting the market decide which banks should survive and which should fail. Originally the 750 billion was so that our government could buy the "TOXIC" loans from the banks, let the owners stay in their homes and renegotiate the loan to make it affordable. After Paulson received the money instead of doing that he gave it to the banks.
In that moment the banks that took government money became government owned. the new President came into office and took off as fast as he could to make sure that he achieved his objectives of DICTATORSHIP. He fired CEOs of companies, came up with a "stress test" to see if the banks were financially sound and when his minions decided that they weren't made them take more money thereby increasing his control over them.
2. He then turned his eyes toward the auto industry because they too were in trouble and they too were too big to fail. He gave them A LOT of money (except FORD, WAY TO GO FORD) and now is trying to mandate what type of vehicles they produce because now they have government money and they have to listen. Do you remember that the SOCIALISTS in office right now said that because they gave bail out money to the banks and auto industry that now the government gets to appoint board member to those companies? and the company doesn't have a choice. Welcome to RUSSIA folks!
3. Now he has the following things on his agenda; HEALTH CARE, that's a nightmare and oh yeah, the DEATH PANEL that SARAH PALIN was criticized for pointing out, IT'S STILL IN THE DRAFT THAT PASSED THE SENATE. I guess she isn't such a nut after all.
4. Then there is CAP and TRADE. if you do not know about this folks, READ UP ON IT! it will cause all of our electric bills to double every month. If you think its hard to pay now, just wait, it can get worse!!
5. Then there is the so called "SMART GRID" electrical transmission upgrade. But this is more than an upgrade. With this the government will put a digital box in your home where your thermostat is now and when the grid is complete and the monitoring computers are online "to test the system for reliability" the government will be able to see what your air conditioning is set on and if they think you are using to much electricity they will turn it off for you. REMOTELY and if you turn it back on before they want you to then you get a huge fine. But that applies to the heater and winter time as well. All of those people in the northern states that get a lot of snow might be in trouble come winter time.
6. Now we hear that the MR Obama wants to pass "NET NEUTRALITY" laws and the FCC wants to tax the Internet purchases you make. The net neutrality laws are like the Fairness Act only on the net. If they don't like what you have to say they can make you stop saying it and if you don't they can fine you or put you in jail.
7. ALL of this is happening right under your noses and if we do not stand up to these people and fight back we may not be able to in the very near future. What happens when they come and try to take our guns. Do you give them up and get led to the slaughter like a lamb?
NOT ME DAMN IT!!!
The only way they are taking what is legally and rightfully mine is out of my cold dead hand after I have emptied all of my ammo protecting freedom!!! I am a soldier and a PATRIOT and my oath of office says to "Protect and Defend the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES against ALL ENEMIES FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC!!
What are you as an American going to do to protect what our founding fathers fought and died for? What are you going to do to protect the freedoms that so many of our men and women in uniform have laid down their lives and shed blood and tears for over the last 260 years?
What are we as TEXANS going to do to insure that we do not lose what OUR founding fathers, men like Stephen F. Austin, William B. Travis, Davy Crockett, Sam Houston and Jim Bowie, fought to insure for us. We have faced a battle with a stronger, bigger nation in the past, and we sent Santa Anna back home to Mexico with his tail between his legs. Let us hope it doesn't come to that again. But remember this; WE HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO OUR FORE FATHERS AND GRAND CHILDREN ALIKE TO PROTECT AND DEFEND TO THE VERY END WHAT WE WERE GIVEN SO THAT WE CAN PASS IT ON TO THE NEXT GENERATION OF FREE MEN!!!
There are things that our state government can do to stop the madness from spilling over into our sovereign state lands. We as voters just have to make our voices heard, and if Washington doesn't listen then Austin will and we can once again become THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS!! CALL YOU CONGRESSMEN, CALL YOUR SENATOR AND DEMAND THAT THEY STOP THIS MADNESS!!! If they can't or won't the tell your local state rep how you feel. make sure that our voices are heard by our leaders in Austin and let them know that we do not want what the rest of the country is doing.
1. There was a supposed housing crisis, that was actually caused by people living beyond there means and banks allowing them to do it. Of course that was dictated by Barney Franks and the House Finance Committee that told the banks they have to give HALF of their housing loans to Low Income Families.
That would not have done it if that were all that had happened. But in order to make that happen "The Barney SHOW" and the housing lenders got creative and decided to offer a new deal, the "sub-prime loan". this means that you buy a house that you normally couldn't afford but the banks are gonna help you out.
How? you only have to pay 2 or 3 percent interest per month on that loan (for the first five years that is) after that you have to pay that mortgage at 7.5 -9 percent in some cases in order to make up the difference that you were not paying for that first five years. Oh Yeah, and while you weren't PAYING that interest in the beginning, it was still accumulating.
So naturally when these people that bought all of these homes under this plan had to face the music and start paying a mortgage that had doubled or more OVER NIGHT they couldn't and had to sell or get foreclosed. That caused the banks to move to the edge of collapse, but only the ones that took part in that deal. To include the banks that traded and sold those mortgages like stock when they new that those loans were RADIOACTIVE to start with.
In most of those cases the banks knew that the borrower was not going to be able to afford that house even after five years and some "FORE CASTED RAISES" that might come. They did it anyway, all at the behest of the "Barney Show". President Bush, Senator McCaine , Ben Bernake and others all tried to tell MR FRANKS that the banking industry and housing market in particular needed to be better regulated because of what was happening and what was coming.
MR FRANKS said "the housing market is doing well, there is no problem. why would I listen you, you're trying to scare the people into believing the sky is falling." And he did nothing to stop it. Then when it happened, he blamed President Bush and the Republicans in office.
But don't worry, here comes the LIBERALS (SOCIALISTS) to save the day. With control of congress and backing from the white house (PRES BUSH) they spent 750 BILLION dollars to prop up these banks that had done this instead of letting the market decide which banks should survive and which should fail. Originally the 750 billion was so that our government could buy the "TOXIC" loans from the banks, let the owners stay in their homes and renegotiate the loan to make it affordable. After Paulson received the money instead of doing that he gave it to the banks.
In that moment the banks that took government money became government owned. the new President came into office and took off as fast as he could to make sure that he achieved his objectives of DICTATORSHIP. He fired CEOs of companies, came up with a "stress test" to see if the banks were financially sound and when his minions decided that they weren't made them take more money thereby increasing his control over them.
2. He then turned his eyes toward the auto industry because they too were in trouble and they too were too big to fail. He gave them A LOT of money (except FORD, WAY TO GO FORD) and now is trying to mandate what type of vehicles they produce because now they have government money and they have to listen. Do you remember that the SOCIALISTS in office right now said that because they gave bail out money to the banks and auto industry that now the government gets to appoint board member to those companies? and the company doesn't have a choice. Welcome to RUSSIA folks!
3. Now he has the following things on his agenda; HEALTH CARE, that's a nightmare and oh yeah, the DEATH PANEL that SARAH PALIN was criticized for pointing out, IT'S STILL IN THE DRAFT THAT PASSED THE SENATE. I guess she isn't such a nut after all.
4. Then there is CAP and TRADE. if you do not know about this folks, READ UP ON IT! it will cause all of our electric bills to double every month. If you think its hard to pay now, just wait, it can get worse!!
5. Then there is the so called "SMART GRID" electrical transmission upgrade. But this is more than an upgrade. With this the government will put a digital box in your home where your thermostat is now and when the grid is complete and the monitoring computers are online "to test the system for reliability" the government will be able to see what your air conditioning is set on and if they think you are using to much electricity they will turn it off for you. REMOTELY and if you turn it back on before they want you to then you get a huge fine. But that applies to the heater and winter time as well. All of those people in the northern states that get a lot of snow might be in trouble come winter time.
6. Now we hear that the MR Obama wants to pass "NET NEUTRALITY" laws and the FCC wants to tax the Internet purchases you make. The net neutrality laws are like the Fairness Act only on the net. If they don't like what you have to say they can make you stop saying it and if you don't they can fine you or put you in jail.
7. ALL of this is happening right under your noses and if we do not stand up to these people and fight back we may not be able to in the very near future. What happens when they come and try to take our guns. Do you give them up and get led to the slaughter like a lamb?
NOT ME DAMN IT!!!
The only way they are taking what is legally and rightfully mine is out of my cold dead hand after I have emptied all of my ammo protecting freedom!!! I am a soldier and a PATRIOT and my oath of office says to "Protect and Defend the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES against ALL ENEMIES FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC!!
What are you as an American going to do to protect what our founding fathers fought and died for? What are you going to do to protect the freedoms that so many of our men and women in uniform have laid down their lives and shed blood and tears for over the last 260 years?
What are we as TEXANS going to do to insure that we do not lose what OUR founding fathers, men like Stephen F. Austin, William B. Travis, Davy Crockett, Sam Houston and Jim Bowie, fought to insure for us. We have faced a battle with a stronger, bigger nation in the past, and we sent Santa Anna back home to Mexico with his tail between his legs. Let us hope it doesn't come to that again. But remember this; WE HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO OUR FORE FATHERS AND GRAND CHILDREN ALIKE TO PROTECT AND DEFEND TO THE VERY END WHAT WE WERE GIVEN SO THAT WE CAN PASS IT ON TO THE NEXT GENERATION OF FREE MEN!!!
There are things that our state government can do to stop the madness from spilling over into our sovereign state lands. We as voters just have to make our voices heard, and if Washington doesn't listen then Austin will and we can once again become THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS!! CALL YOU CONGRESSMEN, CALL YOUR SENATOR AND DEMAND THAT THEY STOP THIS MADNESS!!! If they can't or won't the tell your local state rep how you feel. make sure that our voices are heard by our leaders in Austin and let them know that we do not want what the rest of the country is doing.
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Why should we care??
So I just saw that Mr Obama has reiterated his promise to abolish the don't ask don't tell policy and allow openly gay people to join and serve in the military. Why does it matter? I do not understand why the gay community is in such a big fuss over this. Personally, I don't want to know if they are gay or not, it's not any of my business and frankly...I DON'T CARE ABOUT WHAT THEY DO IN PRIVATE!!!! What I do care about is good order and discipline in the ranks. Now don't get me wrong, I am not saying in anyway that an openly gay person would be any less disciplined than any other soldier. What I am saying is that there are places in the military where there are NO PRIVATE SHOWER facilities and many people, including myself, will not feel comfortable being naked in the same room with another person of the same sex that is openly gay.
That alone will cause problems with moral, discipline and structure within the military. How? Well for one, that person will be taking showers by themselves for the most part because I do not know a single straight person that will take a shower and put themselves in a position of having to be naked in the same room as an openly gay male. this is not a discrimination thing, it is a comfort thing for the vast majority of the military males serving today. And if the powers that be tried to force the ranks to do so there would be so many IG complaints of reverse discrimination and infringing upon one groups right to privacy in order to conform to another groups desire that the backlash would be devastating to the military, starting with a MASS EXODUS of men and women leaving the military.
If you are gay, join the military if you want to, keep your sexual preferences to yourself and behind closed doors. I would not show up and talk about which girl I spent the weekend with or discuss those PRIVATE MATTERS with the people that I work with. Nor would I show any PUBLIC DISPLAY OF AFFECTION to any girl, including my wife, while in uniform.
What your sexual preference is is your business. Frankly, I don't care if you keep a harem of goats in your basement as long as i dont have to see it or be forced to be around it. Keep it to yourself and be HUMBLE and PRIVATE about your personal affairs. Why is it so important that you tell the world that you are gay and I have to accept it graciously and if i do not agree with you them I am a bigot?
That is like just this past week. I had a guy that I have known for 2 years say some things to me that shocked and offended me. We had a bit of a falling out about 3 months ago and for the last 2 months I have been trying to mend those fences. He is a black male 1LT and I am an American Indian Warrant Officer. Finally after 2 months of trying, he sat down at my table and we started to have a conversation. Now I have know that he is a liberal and he knows I am a conservative. the conversation turned to Mr Obama and I told him that there is an article that he should read. It is written by a guy that went to see Charles Krauthammer Speak about Mr Obama. In this speach Mr Krauthammer says that you need to watch what Mr Obama does and do not listen to what he says because he is saying what the masses want to hear but is doing what he wants. He also says that Mr Obama is an egotistical narsasist that thinks he is the ruler of the world.
Well after my former friend read that article he wrote me an email and said "YOU AND EVERYONE THAT THINKS LIKE YOU JUST CANT STAND THAT THERE IS A BLACK MAN IN THE WHITEHOUSE BECAUSE ALL YOU WANT IS SOME RICH, WHITE, LAND OWNER THAT HAS BEEN THE STATUS QUOE."
I wrote back to him and said that I really didn't care if the guy is green, i don't agree with his policies. for him to say something like that made him sound like Louis Farrakahn or Malcom X and that that kind of thinking only perpetuates the hate of the past instead of working toward the future. I also told him that I was offended that after 2 years he didnt know me at all. His response to me on that was to say that the fact that I was offended only proves that I am a racisit.
He further went on to say that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States are irrelevant documents that are dated and don't matter anymore. And that the Military was pork barrel spending and unnecessary.
All because I disagree with raising my taxes to pay for a health care bill that is going to allow someone who doesn't want to work or take care of their own body to get a heart valve replacment yet take away from my 67 year old mothers MediCare insurance to help pay for it. Mean while they tell my mom that her heart problem isn't as bad as it was before the current administration took office. I dont understand how last December they told her that it was imperative that she get this procedure done and in February it is no longer important. Welcome to what OBAMACARE is going to be like folks.
Now he wants to allow those that march in the gay pride rallies wearing diapers and caring sex toys to come into the military and he honestly thinks that there will not be problems??? He said right before the election night "WE ARE 5 DAYS AWAY FROM FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGING THIS COUNTRY" and he absolutely meant that! We are in real trouble folks and its going to be another year before we can vote out the liberals in congress and get some conservative responsible people back into the positions that can represent us.
I urge you to start asking questions now and make sure that the left partisans in our state get voted out. We need to show the rest of the country that we refuse to go down that road with them. We need to show them that we disagree with them and we need to force our politicains to listen to us and not the lobbyists. we elected them not the lobbyists. We need to raise our voices and be heard as conservatives so that the rest of the conservatives across the country can have an example to look to and do the same thing.
We are TEXANS and we have been fighting for freedom since before the ALAMO!! Do you guys remember your history about that? I hope so. The part that I hope you remember the most is when William B. Travis draws a line in the sand and says
"Those who will stand with me step across and be counted as men!!"
It is time for that line to be drawn again!! We must defend what we beleive in or live with the consequences of our inaction!! We must fight agianst the hijacking of our rights that our forefathers fought and died to preserve for us and all of our generations to come. It is our DUTY, our RESPONSIBILITY to take back what is being stolen from us piece by piece everytime there is a vote in Congress. If we do not act now there is going to come a day very soon when we no longer have the power to act without being branded as criminals and traitors. Do not vote along party lines!!! The two party sytem is broken, it is a criminal organization on both sides!! vote for those that beleive in the power of the people, all of the people!! If we have to there are ways to use the legislation in our constitution to protect our Freedoms from the tyranny of the Federal government. It was written that way on purpose.
WE as Americans have a responsibility to our fathers and grandfathers and great grand fathers to protect what they lived and breathed for and to preserve it for our children and grand children and great grand children so that they know that it is their responsibility to do the same and hold the government accountable to the people not the other way around!! If the rest of America's conservatives are unwilling to stand with us then we as TEXANS must stand alone AGAIN!!! The time for action is here and we must make our voices heard before the government tries to silence us for good!!!
That alone will cause problems with moral, discipline and structure within the military. How? Well for one, that person will be taking showers by themselves for the most part because I do not know a single straight person that will take a shower and put themselves in a position of having to be naked in the same room as an openly gay male. this is not a discrimination thing, it is a comfort thing for the vast majority of the military males serving today. And if the powers that be tried to force the ranks to do so there would be so many IG complaints of reverse discrimination and infringing upon one groups right to privacy in order to conform to another groups desire that the backlash would be devastating to the military, starting with a MASS EXODUS of men and women leaving the military.
If you are gay, join the military if you want to, keep your sexual preferences to yourself and behind closed doors. I would not show up and talk about which girl I spent the weekend with or discuss those PRIVATE MATTERS with the people that I work with. Nor would I show any PUBLIC DISPLAY OF AFFECTION to any girl, including my wife, while in uniform.
What your sexual preference is is your business. Frankly, I don't care if you keep a harem of goats in your basement as long as i dont have to see it or be forced to be around it. Keep it to yourself and be HUMBLE and PRIVATE about your personal affairs. Why is it so important that you tell the world that you are gay and I have to accept it graciously and if i do not agree with you them I am a bigot?
That is like just this past week. I had a guy that I have known for 2 years say some things to me that shocked and offended me. We had a bit of a falling out about 3 months ago and for the last 2 months I have been trying to mend those fences. He is a black male 1LT and I am an American Indian Warrant Officer. Finally after 2 months of trying, he sat down at my table and we started to have a conversation. Now I have know that he is a liberal and he knows I am a conservative. the conversation turned to Mr Obama and I told him that there is an article that he should read. It is written by a guy that went to see Charles Krauthammer Speak about Mr Obama. In this speach Mr Krauthammer says that you need to watch what Mr Obama does and do not listen to what he says because he is saying what the masses want to hear but is doing what he wants. He also says that Mr Obama is an egotistical narsasist that thinks he is the ruler of the world.
Well after my former friend read that article he wrote me an email and said "YOU AND EVERYONE THAT THINKS LIKE YOU JUST CANT STAND THAT THERE IS A BLACK MAN IN THE WHITEHOUSE BECAUSE ALL YOU WANT IS SOME RICH, WHITE, LAND OWNER THAT HAS BEEN THE STATUS QUOE."
I wrote back to him and said that I really didn't care if the guy is green, i don't agree with his policies. for him to say something like that made him sound like Louis Farrakahn or Malcom X and that that kind of thinking only perpetuates the hate of the past instead of working toward the future. I also told him that I was offended that after 2 years he didnt know me at all. His response to me on that was to say that the fact that I was offended only proves that I am a racisit.
He further went on to say that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States are irrelevant documents that are dated and don't matter anymore. And that the Military was pork barrel spending and unnecessary.
All because I disagree with raising my taxes to pay for a health care bill that is going to allow someone who doesn't want to work or take care of their own body to get a heart valve replacment yet take away from my 67 year old mothers MediCare insurance to help pay for it. Mean while they tell my mom that her heart problem isn't as bad as it was before the current administration took office. I dont understand how last December they told her that it was imperative that she get this procedure done and in February it is no longer important. Welcome to what OBAMACARE is going to be like folks.
Now he wants to allow those that march in the gay pride rallies wearing diapers and caring sex toys to come into the military and he honestly thinks that there will not be problems??? He said right before the election night "WE ARE 5 DAYS AWAY FROM FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGING THIS COUNTRY" and he absolutely meant that! We are in real trouble folks and its going to be another year before we can vote out the liberals in congress and get some conservative responsible people back into the positions that can represent us.
I urge you to start asking questions now and make sure that the left partisans in our state get voted out. We need to show the rest of the country that we refuse to go down that road with them. We need to show them that we disagree with them and we need to force our politicains to listen to us and not the lobbyists. we elected them not the lobbyists. We need to raise our voices and be heard as conservatives so that the rest of the conservatives across the country can have an example to look to and do the same thing.
We are TEXANS and we have been fighting for freedom since before the ALAMO!! Do you guys remember your history about that? I hope so. The part that I hope you remember the most is when William B. Travis draws a line in the sand and says
"Those who will stand with me step across and be counted as men!!"
It is time for that line to be drawn again!! We must defend what we beleive in or live with the consequences of our inaction!! We must fight agianst the hijacking of our rights that our forefathers fought and died to preserve for us and all of our generations to come. It is our DUTY, our RESPONSIBILITY to take back what is being stolen from us piece by piece everytime there is a vote in Congress. If we do not act now there is going to come a day very soon when we no longer have the power to act without being branded as criminals and traitors. Do not vote along party lines!!! The two party sytem is broken, it is a criminal organization on both sides!! vote for those that beleive in the power of the people, all of the people!! If we have to there are ways to use the legislation in our constitution to protect our Freedoms from the tyranny of the Federal government. It was written that way on purpose.
WE as Americans have a responsibility to our fathers and grandfathers and great grand fathers to protect what they lived and breathed for and to preserve it for our children and grand children and great grand children so that they know that it is their responsibility to do the same and hold the government accountable to the people not the other way around!! If the rest of America's conservatives are unwilling to stand with us then we as TEXANS must stand alone AGAIN!!! The time for action is here and we must make our voices heard before the government tries to silence us for good!!!
Friday, October 2, 2009
conservative vs liberal
If a conservative doesn’t like guns, he doesn`t buy one.
If a liberal doesn't like guns, he feels that no one should have one.
If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn`t eat meat.
If a liberal is, he wants to ban all meat products for everyone.
If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks about how to defeat his enemy.
A liberal wonders how to surrender gracefully and still look good.
If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
If a liberal is homosexual, he loudly demands legislated respect.
If a black man or Hispanic are conservative, they see themselves as independently successful.
Their liberal counterparts see themselves as victims in need of government protection.
If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.
A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him.
If a conservative doesn’t like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Liberals demand that those they don’t like be shut down.
If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn’t go to church.
A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God or religion silenced.
If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We seek not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; may your chains set lightly upon you and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."-
Samuel Adams
If a liberal doesn't like guns, he feels that no one should have one.
If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn`t eat meat.
If a liberal is, he wants to ban all meat products for everyone.
If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks about how to defeat his enemy.
A liberal wonders how to surrender gracefully and still look good.
If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
If a liberal is homosexual, he loudly demands legislated respect.
If a black man or Hispanic are conservative, they see themselves as independently successful.
Their liberal counterparts see themselves as victims in need of government protection.
If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.
A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him.
If a conservative doesn’t like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Liberals demand that those they don’t like be shut down.
If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn’t go to church.
A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God or religion silenced.
If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We seek not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; may your chains set lightly upon you and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."-
Samuel Adams
great article by Ben Stien
WE FIGURED HIM OUT! By Ben Stein
Why is President Barack Obama in such a hurry to get his socialized medicine bill passed?
Because he and his cunning circle realize some basic truths:The American people in their unimaginable kindness and trust voted for a pig in a poke in 2008.
They wanted so much to believe Barack Obama was somehow better and different from other ultra-leftists that they simply took him on faith.
They ignored his anti-white writings in his books.
They ignored his quiet acceptance of hysterical anti-American diatribes by his minister, Jeremiah Wright.
They ignored his refusal to explain years at a time of his life as a student.
They ignored his ultra-left record as a "community organizer," Illinois state legislator, and Senator.
The American people ignored his total zero of an academic record as a student and teacher, his complete lack of scholarship when he was being touted as a scholar.
Now, the American people are starting to wake up to the truth. Barack Obama is a super likeable super leftist, not a fan of this country, way, way too cozy with the terrorist leaders in the Middle East, way beyond naïveté, all the way into active destruction of our interests and our allies and our future.
The American people have already awakened to the truth that the stimulus bill -- a great idea in theory -- was really an immense bribe to Democrat interest groups, and in no way an effort to help all Americans.
Now, Americans are waking up to the truth that Obama Care basically means that every time you are sick or injured, you will have a clerk from the Department of Motor Vehicles telling your doctor what he can and cannot do.
The American people already know that Mr. Obama's plan to lower health costs while expanding coverage and bureaucracy is a myth, a promise of something that never was and never will be -- a bureaucracy lowering costs in a free society. Either the costs go up or the free society goes away.
These are perilous times. Mrs. Hillary Clinton, our Secretary of State, has given Iran the go-ahead to have nuclear weapons, an unqualified betrayal of the nation.
Now, we face a devastating loss of freedom at home in health care. It will be joined by controls on our lives to "protect us" from global warming, itself largely a fraud if believed to be caused by man.
Mr. Obama knows Americans are getting wise and will stop him if he delays at all in taking away our freedoms.There is his urgency and our opportunity. Once freedom is lost, America is lost. Wake up, beloved America.
Why is President Barack Obama in such a hurry to get his socialized medicine bill passed?
Because he and his cunning circle realize some basic truths:The American people in their unimaginable kindness and trust voted for a pig in a poke in 2008.
They wanted so much to believe Barack Obama was somehow better and different from other ultra-leftists that they simply took him on faith.
They ignored his anti-white writings in his books.
They ignored his quiet acceptance of hysterical anti-American diatribes by his minister, Jeremiah Wright.
They ignored his refusal to explain years at a time of his life as a student.
They ignored his ultra-left record as a "community organizer," Illinois state legislator, and Senator.
The American people ignored his total zero of an academic record as a student and teacher, his complete lack of scholarship when he was being touted as a scholar.
Now, the American people are starting to wake up to the truth. Barack Obama is a super likeable super leftist, not a fan of this country, way, way too cozy with the terrorist leaders in the Middle East, way beyond naïveté, all the way into active destruction of our interests and our allies and our future.
The American people have already awakened to the truth that the stimulus bill -- a great idea in theory -- was really an immense bribe to Democrat interest groups, and in no way an effort to help all Americans.
Now, Americans are waking up to the truth that Obama Care basically means that every time you are sick or injured, you will have a clerk from the Department of Motor Vehicles telling your doctor what he can and cannot do.
The American people already know that Mr. Obama's plan to lower health costs while expanding coverage and bureaucracy is a myth, a promise of something that never was and never will be -- a bureaucracy lowering costs in a free society. Either the costs go up or the free society goes away.
These are perilous times. Mrs. Hillary Clinton, our Secretary of State, has given Iran the go-ahead to have nuclear weapons, an unqualified betrayal of the nation.
Now, we face a devastating loss of freedom at home in health care. It will be joined by controls on our lives to "protect us" from global warming, itself largely a fraud if believed to be caused by man.
Mr. Obama knows Americans are getting wise and will stop him if he delays at all in taking away our freedoms.There is his urgency and our opportunity. Once freedom is lost, America is lost. Wake up, beloved America.
interesting article
this is long but worth the read. from Lee Jay Walker. this is an eye opener.
The United States is now gradually waking up to a growing internalIslamic menace which desires to kill in the name of Islam. In the pastweek you have had three different cases involving Islamists who desiredto kill and intimidate the people of America. In the United Kingdom thesame problem exists but just like in America, under President Obama,both nations are pandering to Islam and propagating false lies aboutthis religion. Therefore, it is time to focus on the real factors behindthe growing Sunni Islamic threat within America and in other nations.The first important factor that must be understood is that this threatcomes from radical Sunni Islam and not from Shia Islam. In America andthe United Kingdom you have many Shia Muslims; however, it is clear thatall major global Islamic terrorism derives from radical Sunni Islam.It is also abundantly clear that the Ahmadiyya Muslim community is notinvolved in terrorism because their brand of Islam is based on differentinterpretations and this branch of Islam suffers greatly in Pakistan andother nations, for example in Indonesia. Therefore, it is vital tounderstand where the focus should be because Ahmadiyya Muslims and ShiaMuslims, and other branches of Islam like the Alevi, must be split fromwhere the problem exists.In Lebanon you do have Shia terrorist organizations however they arefocused on either internal problems in Lebanon or on the situation inIsrael. Also, in Yemen you have current problems with the restive Shiapopulation but once more this is an internal matter and not based onexpanding jihad and the same applies to Shia organizations in Iraq andPakistan.Therefore, Islamic terrorist attacks in America, India, Indonesia,Kenya, the United Kingdom, and other nations, have all been done byradical Sunni Islamists. Also, the inspiration behind these terroristattacks is coming from the same avenue and this avenue of terrorism andglobal Islamic jihad can be traced back to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.B. Raman, a specialist in this field stated in the South Asia AnalysisGroup, paper number 1767, that "While the Deobandi extremists have beenbacking---openly or covertly--- Al Qaeda and its ideology, the Barelvishave been uncomfortable over it. Many of them have been critical of theuse of the Pakistani territory by Al Qaeda and the (InternationalIslamic Front) IIF for their terrorist operations in other countries.They have also been worried over the implications of the messagedisseminated by bin Laden in January, 2006, in which he claimed thatplans for another terrorist strike in the US homeland were alreadyunderway."B. Raman also states that "There are two main groups of Sunni sectarianorganisations in Pakistan---the Sipah-e-Sahaba and theLashkar-e-Jhangvi, both strongly Deobandi-Wahabi-Salafi and both membersof the IIF, and the Sunni Tehrik, strongly Barelvi andanti-Deobandi-Wahabi-Salafi. Since many years, the Sipah-e-Sahaba andthe LEJ have embarked on a campaign for the Arabisation and Wahabisationof the Barelvi Muslims and for removing the distorting influence ofHinduism. The Sunni Tehrik has been resisting the onslaught of theDeobandis, Wahabis and Salafis."Therefore, just like B. Raman points out, we can apply this to theinternational arena because the same forces and with Saudi financialbacking, irrespective if government or organizations or wealthyindividuals, is spreading the same message of hate to other nations farand wide. Yet why do nations like America, Indonesia, and the UnitedKingdom, and many others, allow this?It is abundantly clear that the Muslim community in the UK in the 1960sand 1970s is very different to elements within the Muslim communitytoday. According to B. Raman he states that "For the last fifteen years,there has been a conflict between the Deobandis and the Barelvis for thecontrol of the mosques and their funds not only in Pakistan, but also inthe UK. Previously, the Barelvis used to control the mosques in the UKfrequented by immigrants from the sub-continent, but they have sincebeen driven out by the Deobandis and Wahabis. This was the startingpoint for the radicalisation of the Pakistani-origin Muslims in the UKand in the other countries of West Europe. The ISI (Pakistan'sInter-Services Intelligence) has been supporting the Sipah-e-Sahaba andthe LEJ in Pakistan as well as in West Europe."Therefore, it is clear that funding within Pakistan and Saudi Arabia iscausing mayhem and it is obvious that you have "a war within Islam" and"an ongoing Islamic jihad" against moderate Muslims, other sects withinIslam and against non-Muslims. Other channels of funding throughout theMiddle East also applies but the mindset and ideological thinking isbased on the same branches of Islam and it is clear where thecounter-jihad must begin.Yet amazingly, and even after September 11th, whereby nearly all SunniIslamists were Saudi nationals; the United States destroyed a secularbased nation in Iraq and ignored the greater problem. After all, howmany American soldiers and other international forces have been killedby radical Saudi Islamists in Iraq or by Saudi Arabian organizationswhich preach jihad and hatred?Given this, it appears that the focus of attention is based on the wrongarea and even today Saudi Arabian funding is creating mayhem in mainlyMuslim societies or mainly non-Muslim societies where Muslim minoritiesare growing.Walid Phares, author of "The Confrontation: Winning the War againstFuture Jihad," and of many other books and a senior expert in thisfield, stated "Petro-Islamism is also having a big impact in the highereducation sector. As Walid Phares, an expert on global terrorism remarksin The War of Ideas (2007), globally, "a wave of oil funding hituniversity after university, college after college, and research centreafter research centre. The objectives were fully ideological: furtherthe cause of Islam, support the Palestinian cause, and plant the seedsof the concept of an illegitimate West."In Britain, a report about the growing rise of Islamic funding by BrunelUniversity's Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies highlightedthe nature of the problem. The report stated that more than $491 milliondollars have been spent on funding Islamic study centres and other formsof propagation. These institutions include Cambridge and Oxford,therefore, radical Islamists have gained a foothold in major circles.I myself studied at the University of London and radical Islam wasclearly a daily problem and militants were often trying to spread theirhatred and propaganda. It is also noticeable that Omar Sheikh who wasconvicted for the beheading of Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street Journalreporter, also studied at the London School of Economics.Getting back to the radical Sunni Islamic threat then it is vital toconfront this threat openly and to stop hiding behind liberalism, moralrelativism, or untold excuses for why we must understand the causesbehind radical Sunni Islam. The apologist brigade, for example KarenArmstrong, and countless others, portray Islam to be a religion of peacebut Mohammed, the prophet of Islam, did not show much peace towards hisenemies, instead he either enslaved them, had them killed or they wereexiled.Another important factor which must not be overlooked is history. Forexample the Buddhist/Hindu lands which are now called Afghanistan,Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Uzbekistan (especially influenced byZoroastrianism), and other nations; all allowed diversity despiteoccasional bouts of religious tensions. Therefore, you had Buddhists,Hindus, Jains, Nestorian Christians, Pagans, Zoroastrians, and otherfaiths, all mingling together in a vast regionHowever, the onset of Islam changed all this because over time in bothAfghanistan and Uzbekistan, the older religions of Buddhism, Hinduism,and Zoroastrianism (the oldest religion), would be Islamized because ofseveral factors.These factors were multiple but clearly the role of Islamic jihad,dhimmitude, jizya, massive persecution, slavery, forced conversion,control of resources, and so forth, all culminated in a tide ofIslamization.Yet the leaders of these areas would also have believed thataccommodation could have been met and that Islam was just anotherreligion. However, Islam is based on victor and vanquished, and thisreligion is more like an ideology because it fuses religion, politics,economics, law, and the regulation of society, together and clearlynon-Muslims are unequal (indeed Buddhists and Hindus are deemed to besubhuman because they are not people of the Book) in accordance with theteachings of Islam.Even in 2009 apostates from Islam can be killed in accordance with theteachings of Mohammed and other religious believers are still sufferingfrom Islamization. This applies to Christians being burnt alive inPakistan, apostates from Islam being killed in Somalia, attacks againstAhmadiyya Muslims in Pakistan, persecution of Baha'is in Iran, Christianpastors being beheaded in northern Nigeria, Assyrian Christians andother minorities (Shabaks, Yazidis and Mandaean) also fear daily attacksand the same applies to the persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt.The forces of Islamic jihad is ongoing and Buddhists face severepersecution in southern Thailand and the Chittagong Hill Tracts (alsoChristian and Hindu tribal's) in Bangladesh and of course Buddhism inhistory always collapsed when Islamic armies conquered their lands.I stated in a past article, that "Today, just like the 7th century,Islam is still killing apostates or persecuting them. Today, just likein the 7th century, Muslims are still waging wars against non-Muslims incountless numbers of nations. Today, just like the 7th century, Muslimfanatics are still killing fellow Muslims who are deemed to be notMuslim enough.""The apologists will keep on making excuses; however, it is clear thatin many parts of the Islamic dominated world, that hatred stilldictates. Therefore, in 2009, just like in the 7th century, non-Muslimsstill suffer enormous persecution and some Islamists are still dreamingof spreading Islam by the sword or by propaganda."Now this war against non-Muslims and moderate Muslims alike is beingwaged in northern Nigeria against Christians, against Ahmadiyya Muslimsin Pakistan, against Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan, and againstBuddhists in southern Thailand. The same also applies to countless otherconflicts or nations where minorities suffer enormous persecution, forexample the persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt.This jihad is now being propagated within nations like America and theUnited Kingdom. Yet how can you confront your enemy when you have toplay by political correctness, pander to the very same people who wantto enforce Islamic Sharia law on you or have dialogue with a religionwhich supports killing all apostates and treating non-Muslims unequallyin Islamic Sharia law?If we ignore the past diversity of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan,and Uzbekistan, then one day our civilizations may end up the same way?After all, just like the past, religious leaders and elites within theBuddhist, Hindu, Nestorian Christian, and Zoroastrian communities didnot understand the true nature of Islam. However, by the time theyunderstood it was too late and today Buddhism in Afghanistan andPakistan is a distant memory and the same applies to Zoroastrianism inUzbekistan. At the same time, in the modern world Buddhism may soon be adistant memory in southern Thailand if Islamists get their way and maybeIraq will soon have no more Mandaeans?Walid Phares comments on recent events in America and states that "TheNorth Carolina cell, the New York subway plot, the Dallas attempt, theIllinois case, added to the previous cases of the shooting of a soldierin Arkansas, the precedent New York cells, Georgia's young Jihadists,all the way back to the infamous Virginia paintball network, if anythinggives us the genome of what is morphing inside the country -- a vastbody of dispersed cells with at least one binding force -- the Jihadiideology. The question thus is to find out who is propagating thedoctrines of Jihadism: who is funding it; who is protecting theindoctrination operation which leads naturally to the rise of homegrownor foreign linked, lone wolves or packs of Jihadists, Terrorists. Thatis the real question: where is the factory?"Therefore, it is vital to stop major funding which is spreading radicalSunni Islam and to focus on where the threat is. It is also vital thatnational governments work together and that history is not forgotten.Also, more attention must be focused on persecution and injustice"within the House of Islam" and the "real Mohammed" must be told insteadof the Western liberal version which is bent on appeasement andrevisionism.
The United States is now gradually waking up to a growing internalIslamic menace which desires to kill in the name of Islam. In the pastweek you have had three different cases involving Islamists who desiredto kill and intimidate the people of America. In the United Kingdom thesame problem exists but just like in America, under President Obama,both nations are pandering to Islam and propagating false lies aboutthis religion. Therefore, it is time to focus on the real factors behindthe growing Sunni Islamic threat within America and in other nations.The first important factor that must be understood is that this threatcomes from radical Sunni Islam and not from Shia Islam. In America andthe United Kingdom you have many Shia Muslims; however, it is clear thatall major global Islamic terrorism derives from radical Sunni Islam.It is also abundantly clear that the Ahmadiyya Muslim community is notinvolved in terrorism because their brand of Islam is based on differentinterpretations and this branch of Islam suffers greatly in Pakistan andother nations, for example in Indonesia. Therefore, it is vital tounderstand where the focus should be because Ahmadiyya Muslims and ShiaMuslims, and other branches of Islam like the Alevi, must be split fromwhere the problem exists.In Lebanon you do have Shia terrorist organizations however they arefocused on either internal problems in Lebanon or on the situation inIsrael. Also, in Yemen you have current problems with the restive Shiapopulation but once more this is an internal matter and not based onexpanding jihad and the same applies to Shia organizations in Iraq andPakistan.Therefore, Islamic terrorist attacks in America, India, Indonesia,Kenya, the United Kingdom, and other nations, have all been done byradical Sunni Islamists. Also, the inspiration behind these terroristattacks is coming from the same avenue and this avenue of terrorism andglobal Islamic jihad can be traced back to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.B. Raman, a specialist in this field stated in the South Asia AnalysisGroup, paper number 1767, that "While the Deobandi extremists have beenbacking---openly or covertly--- Al Qaeda and its ideology, the Barelvishave been uncomfortable over it. Many of them have been critical of theuse of the Pakistani territory by Al Qaeda and the (InternationalIslamic Front) IIF for their terrorist operations in other countries.They have also been worried over the implications of the messagedisseminated by bin Laden in January, 2006, in which he claimed thatplans for another terrorist strike in the US homeland were alreadyunderway."B. Raman also states that "There are two main groups of Sunni sectarianorganisations in Pakistan---the Sipah-e-Sahaba and theLashkar-e-Jhangvi, both strongly Deobandi-Wahabi-Salafi and both membersof the IIF, and the Sunni Tehrik, strongly Barelvi andanti-Deobandi-Wahabi-Salafi. Since many years, the Sipah-e-Sahaba andthe LEJ have embarked on a campaign for the Arabisation and Wahabisationof the Barelvi Muslims and for removing the distorting influence ofHinduism. The Sunni Tehrik has been resisting the onslaught of theDeobandis, Wahabis and Salafis."Therefore, just like B. Raman points out, we can apply this to theinternational arena because the same forces and with Saudi financialbacking, irrespective if government or organizations or wealthyindividuals, is spreading the same message of hate to other nations farand wide. Yet why do nations like America, Indonesia, and the UnitedKingdom, and many others, allow this?It is abundantly clear that the Muslim community in the UK in the 1960sand 1970s is very different to elements within the Muslim communitytoday. According to B. Raman he states that "For the last fifteen years,there has been a conflict between the Deobandis and the Barelvis for thecontrol of the mosques and their funds not only in Pakistan, but also inthe UK. Previously, the Barelvis used to control the mosques in the UKfrequented by immigrants from the sub-continent, but they have sincebeen driven out by the Deobandis and Wahabis. This was the startingpoint for the radicalisation of the Pakistani-origin Muslims in the UKand in the other countries of West Europe. The ISI (Pakistan'sInter-Services Intelligence) has been supporting the Sipah-e-Sahaba andthe LEJ in Pakistan as well as in West Europe."Therefore, it is clear that funding within Pakistan and Saudi Arabia iscausing mayhem and it is obvious that you have "a war within Islam" and"an ongoing Islamic jihad" against moderate Muslims, other sects withinIslam and against non-Muslims. Other channels of funding throughout theMiddle East also applies but the mindset and ideological thinking isbased on the same branches of Islam and it is clear where thecounter-jihad must begin.Yet amazingly, and even after September 11th, whereby nearly all SunniIslamists were Saudi nationals; the United States destroyed a secularbased nation in Iraq and ignored the greater problem. After all, howmany American soldiers and other international forces have been killedby radical Saudi Islamists in Iraq or by Saudi Arabian organizationswhich preach jihad and hatred?Given this, it appears that the focus of attention is based on the wrongarea and even today Saudi Arabian funding is creating mayhem in mainlyMuslim societies or mainly non-Muslim societies where Muslim minoritiesare growing.Walid Phares, author of "The Confrontation: Winning the War againstFuture Jihad," and of many other books and a senior expert in thisfield, stated "Petro-Islamism is also having a big impact in the highereducation sector. As Walid Phares, an expert on global terrorism remarksin The War of Ideas (2007), globally, "a wave of oil funding hituniversity after university, college after college, and research centreafter research centre. The objectives were fully ideological: furtherthe cause of Islam, support the Palestinian cause, and plant the seedsof the concept of an illegitimate West."In Britain, a report about the growing rise of Islamic funding by BrunelUniversity's Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies highlightedthe nature of the problem. The report stated that more than $491 milliondollars have been spent on funding Islamic study centres and other formsof propagation. These institutions include Cambridge and Oxford,therefore, radical Islamists have gained a foothold in major circles.I myself studied at the University of London and radical Islam wasclearly a daily problem and militants were often trying to spread theirhatred and propaganda. It is also noticeable that Omar Sheikh who wasconvicted for the beheading of Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street Journalreporter, also studied at the London School of Economics.Getting back to the radical Sunni Islamic threat then it is vital toconfront this threat openly and to stop hiding behind liberalism, moralrelativism, or untold excuses for why we must understand the causesbehind radical Sunni Islam. The apologist brigade, for example KarenArmstrong, and countless others, portray Islam to be a religion of peacebut Mohammed, the prophet of Islam, did not show much peace towards hisenemies, instead he either enslaved them, had them killed or they wereexiled.Another important factor which must not be overlooked is history. Forexample the Buddhist/Hindu lands which are now called Afghanistan,Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Uzbekistan (especially influenced byZoroastrianism), and other nations; all allowed diversity despiteoccasional bouts of religious tensions. Therefore, you had Buddhists,Hindus, Jains, Nestorian Christians, Pagans, Zoroastrians, and otherfaiths, all mingling together in a vast regionHowever, the onset of Islam changed all this because over time in bothAfghanistan and Uzbekistan, the older religions of Buddhism, Hinduism,and Zoroastrianism (the oldest religion), would be Islamized because ofseveral factors.These factors were multiple but clearly the role of Islamic jihad,dhimmitude, jizya, massive persecution, slavery, forced conversion,control of resources, and so forth, all culminated in a tide ofIslamization.Yet the leaders of these areas would also have believed thataccommodation could have been met and that Islam was just anotherreligion. However, Islam is based on victor and vanquished, and thisreligion is more like an ideology because it fuses religion, politics,economics, law, and the regulation of society, together and clearlynon-Muslims are unequal (indeed Buddhists and Hindus are deemed to besubhuman because they are not people of the Book) in accordance with theteachings of Islam.Even in 2009 apostates from Islam can be killed in accordance with theteachings of Mohammed and other religious believers are still sufferingfrom Islamization. This applies to Christians being burnt alive inPakistan, apostates from Islam being killed in Somalia, attacks againstAhmadiyya Muslims in Pakistan, persecution of Baha'is in Iran, Christianpastors being beheaded in northern Nigeria, Assyrian Christians andother minorities (Shabaks, Yazidis and Mandaean) also fear daily attacksand the same applies to the persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt.The forces of Islamic jihad is ongoing and Buddhists face severepersecution in southern Thailand and the Chittagong Hill Tracts (alsoChristian and Hindu tribal's) in Bangladesh and of course Buddhism inhistory always collapsed when Islamic armies conquered their lands.I stated in a past article, that "Today, just like the 7th century,Islam is still killing apostates or persecuting them. Today, just likein the 7th century, Muslims are still waging wars against non-Muslims incountless numbers of nations. Today, just like the 7th century, Muslimfanatics are still killing fellow Muslims who are deemed to be notMuslim enough.""The apologists will keep on making excuses; however, it is clear thatin many parts of the Islamic dominated world, that hatred stilldictates. Therefore, in 2009, just like in the 7th century, non-Muslimsstill suffer enormous persecution and some Islamists are still dreamingof spreading Islam by the sword or by propaganda."Now this war against non-Muslims and moderate Muslims alike is beingwaged in northern Nigeria against Christians, against Ahmadiyya Muslimsin Pakistan, against Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan, and againstBuddhists in southern Thailand. The same also applies to countless otherconflicts or nations where minorities suffer enormous persecution, forexample the persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt.This jihad is now being propagated within nations like America and theUnited Kingdom. Yet how can you confront your enemy when you have toplay by political correctness, pander to the very same people who wantto enforce Islamic Sharia law on you or have dialogue with a religionwhich supports killing all apostates and treating non-Muslims unequallyin Islamic Sharia law?If we ignore the past diversity of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan,and Uzbekistan, then one day our civilizations may end up the same way?After all, just like the past, religious leaders and elites within theBuddhist, Hindu, Nestorian Christian, and Zoroastrian communities didnot understand the true nature of Islam. However, by the time theyunderstood it was too late and today Buddhism in Afghanistan andPakistan is a distant memory and the same applies to Zoroastrianism inUzbekistan. At the same time, in the modern world Buddhism may soon be adistant memory in southern Thailand if Islamists get their way and maybeIraq will soon have no more Mandaeans?Walid Phares comments on recent events in America and states that "TheNorth Carolina cell, the New York subway plot, the Dallas attempt, theIllinois case, added to the previous cases of the shooting of a soldierin Arkansas, the precedent New York cells, Georgia's young Jihadists,all the way back to the infamous Virginia paintball network, if anythinggives us the genome of what is morphing inside the country -- a vastbody of dispersed cells with at least one binding force -- the Jihadiideology. The question thus is to find out who is propagating thedoctrines of Jihadism: who is funding it; who is protecting theindoctrination operation which leads naturally to the rise of homegrownor foreign linked, lone wolves or packs of Jihadists, Terrorists. Thatis the real question: where is the factory?"Therefore, it is vital to stop major funding which is spreading radicalSunni Islam and to focus on where the threat is. It is also vital thatnational governments work together and that history is not forgotten.Also, more attention must be focused on persecution and injustice"within the House of Islam" and the "real Mohammed" must be told insteadof the Western liberal version which is bent on appeasement andrevisionism.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Go to the link below and click on it. i hope it works I cant save the video to my computer so this is the best i can do.
http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9UEd1a0x1WHpIMUU=
http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9UEd1a0x1WHpIMUU=
Sunday, September 27, 2009
this is an attack of Humana by the OBAMA Administration
Another reason to be scared of Obamacare.
The health insurance company targeted by the Obama administration and a topSenate Democrat properly followed guidance dating back to the Clinton administration and should not be punished, Republicans said Thursday.
House and Senate Republicans have put up a wall of resistance against the decision by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to launch a probe into Humana for sending to its members what Democratic Sen. Max Baucus called "false" information about health care reform legislation.
Senate Republicans on Thursday threatened to block Obama's healthcare-related appointments if the decision is not reversed, and House Republicans called for a hearing on what they described as a politically motivated "gag order." "It's an astonishing overreach," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell,R-Ky., told FOX News on Thursday.
CMS began the probe at the request of Baucus, D-Mont., the chairman of theSenate Finance Committee, over a mailer Baucus claims misled seniors about proposed changes to Medicare. Humana, one of the largest private carriers serving seniors under theMedicare Advantage program, focused its mailer on the potential for cuts to service.
Republicans said Humana's claim was accurate in the first place. But as proof its behavior was above board, they held up a Clinton-era letter from the Department of Health and Human Services offering guidance on mailers sent by insurers to customers. The 1997 letter, written by Center for Health Plans and Providers Director Bruce Fried to a law firm, addressed the question of whether HMOs could tell members about proposed legislation and urge them to express their opinions. The letter concluded that restrictions could violate free speech laws. "While it may be difficult for a reviewer to ascertain whether or not the information about legislation, for example contained in a member's newsletter issued by an HMO, is accurate and without a slant or unrevealed self-interest, we believe that prohibiting such information would violate basic freedom of speech and other constitutional rights of the Medicarebeneficiary as a citizen," the letter reads.
The letter noted that information about members' and HMOs' rights and responsibilities should not be "misrepresented," but the general requirement for such mailers would be an attached disclaimer saying the information has not been reviewed for "accuracy or misrepresentation." Humana attached a nearly identical disclaimer in its mailer. Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., ranking member of the House Ways and MeansCommittee, said the letter is proof that CMS was in conflict with its own policy. "This actually reverses a Clinton administration policy that said, actually,seniors have a right to know how their benefits may be affected," Camp toldFOX News.
McConnell and other top Senate Republicans cited the same evidence in their letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius Thursday in which they demanded that the "gag order" be lifted. "Now, the Obama administration has reversed this longstanding HHS decision-- in the midst of a critical debate about the future of health care services in our country -- to shut down communication between private companies and America's seniors on an issue that has a direct impact ontheir health care," the letter said. Republicans said the administration essentially was punishing Humana for questioning the plan and firing a warning shot at any other companies that might be thinking of doing the same.
The Department of Health and Human Services on Monday not only targeted Humana, but sent out a broad directive to all Medicare Advantage participants, telling them to "immediately discontinue all such mailings"and remove any such material from their Web sites. Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for America's Health Insurance Plans, said the order went out to about 200 companies Monday night, just as the SenateFinance Committee was about to start debate on its version of health carereform.
"This is an effort to stifle any dissent," he said. "They are silencing opposition to the president's Medicare cuts," said Camp spokesman Sage Eastman. Camp and the other minority members of the House Ways and Means Committee wrote a letter Thursday to Chairman Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., urging a hearing in order to "investigate the unusual and potentially politically motivated decision by CMS to eliminate the flow of factual information from private health plans to their enrollees." Humana has donated heavily to both Democratic and Republican lawmakers over the last decade, including McConnell and Camp but also Baucus. Baucus is more heavily funded by health insurance companies like Aetna and BlueCross/Blue Shield.
In its original mailer, Humana expressed concern about proposals to cutMedicare and Medicaid spending by about $500 billion over 10 years,including payments to Medicare Advantage plans worth about $125 billion. "While these programs need to be made more efficient, if the proposed funding cut levels become law, millions of seniors and disabled individuals could lose many of the important benefits and services that make Medicare Advantage health plans so valuable," the mailer reads. It urged seniors to sign up with Humana for regular updates on thelegislation and encouraged them to contact their lawmakers in Washington.
Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Elmendorf on Thursday agreed that seniors in the Medicare Advantage plans could see reduced benefits under Baucus' legislation. But Baucus said the proposed bill would not cut benefits. "I'm not going to let insurance company profits stand in the way of improving Medicare for seniors," he said in a statement, calling efforts to mislead seniors "wholly unacceptable." Analysts say the Medicare Advantage plans are being paid too much -- about 14 percent more than it costs to care for seniors in traditional Medicare.
Democrats continued to assert that the company had made a false claim and that Republicans were again demonstrating their affinity for the insurance industry. Baucus said the mailer could be a violation of federal regulations. But AARP, which also helps administer Medicare plans in conjunction with United Healthcare, has weighed in on that part of the health care debate as well -- only on the other side. The AARP continues to feature ads on an affiliated Web site defending the Medicare changes. One ad blasts critics for spreading "myths and scaretactics," and claims the reforms will not "hurt" Medicare but "actually strengthen it by eliminating billions of dollars in waste and lowering drug prices." Another AARP article declares, "Controlling the rising costs of Medicare doesn't mean cutting benefits." Eastman said AARP is not being held to the same standard as Humana. "If you're going to silence the critics you need to silence the proponents too," he said. "This clearly smacks of politics."
ARE YOU SCARED YET??? YOU SHOULD BE, THIS COULD BE YOUR MOM OR DAD THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT HERE.
The health insurance company targeted by the Obama administration and a topSenate Democrat properly followed guidance dating back to the Clinton administration and should not be punished, Republicans said Thursday.
House and Senate Republicans have put up a wall of resistance against the decision by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to launch a probe into Humana for sending to its members what Democratic Sen. Max Baucus called "false" information about health care reform legislation.
Senate Republicans on Thursday threatened to block Obama's healthcare-related appointments if the decision is not reversed, and House Republicans called for a hearing on what they described as a politically motivated "gag order." "It's an astonishing overreach," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell,R-Ky., told FOX News on Thursday.
CMS began the probe at the request of Baucus, D-Mont., the chairman of theSenate Finance Committee, over a mailer Baucus claims misled seniors about proposed changes to Medicare. Humana, one of the largest private carriers serving seniors under theMedicare Advantage program, focused its mailer on the potential for cuts to service.
Republicans said Humana's claim was accurate in the first place. But as proof its behavior was above board, they held up a Clinton-era letter from the Department of Health and Human Services offering guidance on mailers sent by insurers to customers. The 1997 letter, written by Center for Health Plans and Providers Director Bruce Fried to a law firm, addressed the question of whether HMOs could tell members about proposed legislation and urge them to express their opinions. The letter concluded that restrictions could violate free speech laws. "While it may be difficult for a reviewer to ascertain whether or not the information about legislation, for example contained in a member's newsletter issued by an HMO, is accurate and without a slant or unrevealed self-interest, we believe that prohibiting such information would violate basic freedom of speech and other constitutional rights of the Medicarebeneficiary as a citizen," the letter reads.
The letter noted that information about members' and HMOs' rights and responsibilities should not be "misrepresented," but the general requirement for such mailers would be an attached disclaimer saying the information has not been reviewed for "accuracy or misrepresentation." Humana attached a nearly identical disclaimer in its mailer. Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., ranking member of the House Ways and MeansCommittee, said the letter is proof that CMS was in conflict with its own policy. "This actually reverses a Clinton administration policy that said, actually,seniors have a right to know how their benefits may be affected," Camp toldFOX News.
McConnell and other top Senate Republicans cited the same evidence in their letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius Thursday in which they demanded that the "gag order" be lifted. "Now, the Obama administration has reversed this longstanding HHS decision-- in the midst of a critical debate about the future of health care services in our country -- to shut down communication between private companies and America's seniors on an issue that has a direct impact ontheir health care," the letter said. Republicans said the administration essentially was punishing Humana for questioning the plan and firing a warning shot at any other companies that might be thinking of doing the same.
The Department of Health and Human Services on Monday not only targeted Humana, but sent out a broad directive to all Medicare Advantage participants, telling them to "immediately discontinue all such mailings"and remove any such material from their Web sites. Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for America's Health Insurance Plans, said the order went out to about 200 companies Monday night, just as the SenateFinance Committee was about to start debate on its version of health carereform.
"This is an effort to stifle any dissent," he said. "They are silencing opposition to the president's Medicare cuts," said Camp spokesman Sage Eastman. Camp and the other minority members of the House Ways and Means Committee wrote a letter Thursday to Chairman Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., urging a hearing in order to "investigate the unusual and potentially politically motivated decision by CMS to eliminate the flow of factual information from private health plans to their enrollees." Humana has donated heavily to both Democratic and Republican lawmakers over the last decade, including McConnell and Camp but also Baucus. Baucus is more heavily funded by health insurance companies like Aetna and BlueCross/Blue Shield.
In its original mailer, Humana expressed concern about proposals to cutMedicare and Medicaid spending by about $500 billion over 10 years,including payments to Medicare Advantage plans worth about $125 billion. "While these programs need to be made more efficient, if the proposed funding cut levels become law, millions of seniors and disabled individuals could lose many of the important benefits and services that make Medicare Advantage health plans so valuable," the mailer reads. It urged seniors to sign up with Humana for regular updates on thelegislation and encouraged them to contact their lawmakers in Washington.
Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Elmendorf on Thursday agreed that seniors in the Medicare Advantage plans could see reduced benefits under Baucus' legislation. But Baucus said the proposed bill would not cut benefits. "I'm not going to let insurance company profits stand in the way of improving Medicare for seniors," he said in a statement, calling efforts to mislead seniors "wholly unacceptable." Analysts say the Medicare Advantage plans are being paid too much -- about 14 percent more than it costs to care for seniors in traditional Medicare.
Democrats continued to assert that the company had made a false claim and that Republicans were again demonstrating their affinity for the insurance industry. Baucus said the mailer could be a violation of federal regulations. But AARP, which also helps administer Medicare plans in conjunction with United Healthcare, has weighed in on that part of the health care debate as well -- only on the other side. The AARP continues to feature ads on an affiliated Web site defending the Medicare changes. One ad blasts critics for spreading "myths and scaretactics," and claims the reforms will not "hurt" Medicare but "actually strengthen it by eliminating billions of dollars in waste and lowering drug prices." Another AARP article declares, "Controlling the rising costs of Medicare doesn't mean cutting benefits." Eastman said AARP is not being held to the same standard as Humana. "If you're going to silence the critics you need to silence the proponents too," he said. "This clearly smacks of politics."
ARE YOU SCARED YET??? YOU SHOULD BE, THIS COULD BE YOUR MOM OR DAD THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT HERE.
HOLY CRAP!!! WAS ANYONE LISTENING TO HER???
This was taken before the election, talk about fulfillment. They told us what they were going to do before the election and the country didn't listen. We are an oil state at heart. Is this what you want our heritage to become? Personally, i know that she would never get elected in our state, but she doesn't have to. All she has to do is go to Washington with the rest of the liberal socialist from California, New York, Massachusetts and the rest of them and they can FORCE US TO PLAY BY THEIR RULES, like it or not!!! I think its time that we as TEXANS reevaluate our place in this country and ask ourselves if we want to follow that path. CAP and SPEND is coming. If you dont know about it, read now!!! Fight this tooth and nail otherwise your monthly electric bill will double... THATS RIGHT... if you pay 200 a month now your going to be paying 400 if this passes. Do we have the power to stop it as one state? I don't know, maybe but do we really care? we have the right as a free state to disagree with that but if it passes we will be forced into servitude even more by this corrupt government. If you don't beleive that they are actively pursuing that agenda, you might want to take another look at the video.
I have a question for my fellow TEXANS
OK, so i have this friend that is from Tennessee, he's a great guy, thinks the way i do about politics and such, but... He likes to give me a hard time about the fact that I just bought 6 M4 style carbine rifles and 2 more that fire AK47 rounds but look like the M4. (those 2 are made by armalite at armalite.com called the AR10, if your interested) Oh yeah, he bought one of those from me by the way. Anyway back to my point here. He keeps saying things like, "Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are going to come and take your guns because you don't need them for protection that's why the government is here, then take your land away and say you don't deserve all that land because you worked for it. We are going to give it to this guy who doesn't have anything and doesn't want to work." My response to that was simple, I personally don't think she or Harry would get past Midland or Odessa before somebody introduced her to a tall tree and a short rope. We are Texans and we grew up with guns and land and freedom and no tree hugging, terrorist loving, socialist, left wing radical from CALIFORNIA(pffh) is going to come here or go to Washington and legislate our rights away without some serious back lash. Now please don't get me wrong, I am in no way advocating violence against our duly elected officials, however, WE IN TEXAS DID NOT ELECT HER OR HARRY "BALLS" REID. So why should we have to follow their crazy left wing radical ideas? Let's see how well that has worked for Mrs Pelosi so far... Cali has one of the highest state taxes in the country yet operates with a 43 billion dollar deficit this year and had to take bailout money from the fed. Texas has no state taxes yet somehow managed to have a 9 billion dollar surplus last year. hmmmm. Makes you wonder who's right doesn't it. If I operated my bank account with a 100.00 dollar deficit for any amount of time I would be severely penalized by my creditors and I sure as hell can't borrow money to pay off debt, I've tried that, but they say no because they say I don't have enough collateral... I think its because they don't want me to get out of debt that soon because the banks lose money when I pay them off early. So my question is simple... How far up your drive way would Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid get if you knew that they were coming to take away what you earned to give it to someone in a different state that didn't work and didn't want to? I look forward to seeing these responses.
Talk about spending!!??!!
SO What would say if I were to tell you that in the last month in this one Brigade that I am assigned to we spent in the neighborhood of 20 million dollars of your money to improve infrastructure of IRAQ? I'm not talking about things that we damaged during the war, i mean things like building or repairing water treatment facilities, schools, roads, court houses, buying front loaders and graders and over 400K on computers and trainers to teach the kids how to use them. the reason that i mention this is because our federal government is sending all of this money, your money, over here instead of in our own country on the exact same things that need improvement when we could be helping the Iraqis with this by making them use their own revenue from oil and international trade. i am not sure that our founding fathers meant that we should go and impose our own way of life on other people when they founded this country. I believe that they meant for us to stand up and show the world that a free society can work and let the rest of the world choose it's own path. imposing one countries beliefs and values on another is called imperialism and if I am not mistaken is the reason for the American revolution about 234 years ago. don't get me wrong, i believe in helping people stand on there own but the key to that is teaching them how and showing them what worked for us. not spending our own money to do it for them. I'm just saying, ya know. feel free to comment
so here is something that a friend of mine put on her myspace and i happen to agree with. think about this for a moment and then think about what this country, and our state, was founded on. hard work earns good rewards. do for yourself and help when you can. don't expect anybody to do anything for you that you can do for yourself. that's how I was raised and that is what I was aught here in the Great state of TEXAS. so take a look below and feel free to comment.
Like most folks in this country, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test (with which I have no problem). What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test. So, here is my Question: Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them? Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their ass ? doing drugs, while I work. . . Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check? I guess we could title that program, Urine or You're Out'.Pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't. Hope you all will pass it ...
Like most folks in this country, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test (with which I have no problem). What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test. So, here is my Question: Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them? Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their ass ? doing drugs, while I work. . . Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check? I guess we could title that program, Urine or You're Out'.Pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't. Hope you all will pass it ...
Is Mr Obama really an American??? I'm just asking
This registration document, made available on Jan. 24, 2007, by the Fransiskus Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia, shows the registration of Barack Obama under the name Barry Soetoro made by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro. Name: Barry Soetoro
Religion: ..... Islam
Nationality: ..... Indonesian How did little INDONESIAN, Barry Soetoro, (A.K.A. Barack Obama) get around the issue of nationality to become president?
Someone who tells lies is a L __ __ r?
PART 2:
In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's qualifications for the presidency, the group "Americans for Freedom of Information" has released copies of President Obama's college transcripts from Occidental College .Released today, the transcript indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate at the school.
The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California.
The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama's detractors have been seeking.
Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya and there is no record of him ever applying for US citizenship, this is looking pretty grim.
The news has created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about Obama's legitimacy and qualification to serve as president.
When reached for comment in London , where he has been in meetings with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Obama smiled but refused comment on the issue.Britain 's Daily Mail has also carried the story in a front-page article titled, "Obama Eligibility Questioned," leading some to speculate that the story may overshadow economic issues on Obama's first official visit to the U.K.In a related matter, under growing pressure from several groups, Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve as President in a case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey .This lawsuit claims Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. Donofrio's case is just one of 18 suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama's citizenship or qualifications to serve as president.Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results of their investigation of Obama's campaign spending.
This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of his personal records.Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still on-going but that the final report will be provided to the U.S. attorney general, Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the matter.LET OTHER PEOPLE KNOW THIS NEWS THE MEDIA WON'T LET IT BE KNOWN!
NEITHER ONE OF THE OBAMA PAIR HAD TIME TO GET A REAL JOB AND WORK FOR A PAY CHECK. WE PAID THE BALANCE ON THEIR EDUCATION AND TRAVEL.
Religion: ..... Islam
Nationality: ..... Indonesian How did little INDONESIAN, Barry Soetoro, (A.K.A. Barack Obama) get around the issue of nationality to become president?
Someone who tells lies is a L __ __ r?
PART 2:
In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's qualifications for the presidency, the group "Americans for Freedom of Information" has released copies of President Obama's college transcripts from Occidental College .Released today, the transcript indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate at the school.
The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California.
The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama's detractors have been seeking.
Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya and there is no record of him ever applying for US citizenship, this is looking pretty grim.
The news has created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about Obama's legitimacy and qualification to serve as president.
When reached for comment in London , where he has been in meetings with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Obama smiled but refused comment on the issue.Britain 's Daily Mail has also carried the story in a front-page article titled, "Obama Eligibility Questioned," leading some to speculate that the story may overshadow economic issues on Obama's first official visit to the U.K.In a related matter, under growing pressure from several groups, Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve as President in a case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey .This lawsuit claims Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. Donofrio's case is just one of 18 suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama's citizenship or qualifications to serve as president.Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results of their investigation of Obama's campaign spending.
This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of his personal records.Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still on-going but that the final report will be provided to the U.S. attorney general, Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the matter.LET OTHER PEOPLE KNOW THIS NEWS THE MEDIA WON'T LET IT BE KNOWN!
NEITHER ONE OF THE OBAMA PAIR HAD TIME TO GET A REAL JOB AND WORK FOR A PAY CHECK. WE PAID THE BALANCE ON THEIR EDUCATION AND TRAVEL.
THE FUTURE OF OUR STATE
Hi this is something new for me, I have always been politically wary and vocal about it, however, this is the first time that I have put those thoughts in writing.Why is it that every time we turn on MSNBC or CBS or CNN we hear about how great the president and our Democratic Congress are doing but when PRESIDENT Bush was in office all we heard was negative? Was he really doing that bad of a job? and is Mr. Obama really that great? well let's put a few things into perspective and then you can decide. 1. Did either President Bush ever sit in a domestic terrorists home to plan his political future? No, but Mr Obama did. he sat in Bill Ayers' home in chicago to plan his campaigns more than one time, he did it multiple times.2. Did either President Bush ever have close political and real estate ties wwith a known criminal and embezzeler? No, but Mr Obama did. Tony Resko is serving time in a federal prison for it and he and Mr. Obama bought joining pieces of property and then Mr Resko sold his portion of that property to Mr Obama for pennies on the dollar. 3. Did President Bush ever even consider hiring an individual into his inner circle of advisors that was a self avowed Communist and proud of that? No, but Mr Obama did when he hired Van Jones as the GREEN JOBS CZAR. Speaking of Czar's if i know my history correctly that is the Russian name for King. Am I the only one that sees a problem here?4. How many tax cheats did President Bush hire and /or appoint as cabinet members within his administration? ZERO, but Mr Obama has appointed or tried to appoint at least 6 that I can remember.5. Did President Bush ever try to legistate away our rights as Amercans to bear arms? No, but Mr. Obama and the democratic congress are. Why is that? Well lets think about this logically for just a minute. According to the Second Ammendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, and I am writing DIRECTLY from that document that is right in front of me, "A WELL REGULATED MALITIA, BEING NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE, THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED."Well lets ask ourselves one question. If the government has a permanent standing army, why would the founders of this country and authors of this document put that ammendment in our founding document? Well Thomas Jefferson believed and stated that in order to insure that the government should not oppress the people but instead answer to them, the people shall have the right to defend themselves against the government. That the people, not the government have the power of self regulation. In other words, our founding fathers wanted to insure that WE THE PEOPLE would never become oppressed or forced into servitude again so they gave us our only defense against our own government if that became necessary. So I ask you why is the current administration trying to disarm this country?6. Speaking of Ammendments to the constitution, let's take a look at the First Ammendment for just a moment. Again I will write this directly from the document sitting on my desk. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXCERCISE THEREOF; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, OR THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE PEACEABLY TO ASSEMBLE, AND TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES.Well after reading that and then seeing the Second ammendment, the right to keep and bear arms, it starts to look a bit clearer to me. I don't know maybe I'm off base but it sounds like our founding fathers said in a nut shell, "Look guys, we voted you in, you work for us, and if we have a problem with how your doing things we're gonna let you know about it. Oh by the way, to make sure you can't shut us up read the second ammendment because if you try to shut us up we will just forcibly remove you from office because we gave ourselves the right to do so."Now I am not saying that President Bush was perfect or right about everything. I freaking HATED the fact that he authorized bailout money on his way out the door. What happened to free enterprise and capitolism and the strong survive and the weak fall by the wayside. And since when did people get rewarded for screwing up? I mean if I were to lose half a billion dollars in my job I would go to jail not get a bonus. why did we reward these guys with money yet the ones that were doing a great job got no recognition for it.Our economy is no better off than it would have been had those banks failed and their assets bought up by the banks that were strong. but now, they are under the direct supervision and control of a government that has dozens of advisors that openly believe in a Marxist society.. Those of us in Texas have never and will never believe in that way of olife because we are a proud people that believes that you get what you earn and you earn what you deserve. Why do I have to pay for some guy or girl to sit at home and fill out job applications that they never intend to submit but is a requirement for them to pick up their weekly check. A check that is paid for by our tax money. I think that this is going to be a long discussion and a blog worth writing. I have to go for now but I will be back on later. check back with me and tell me what you think. when i return I'm not sure where this discussion will go but I'm sure it will be interesting. For now just remember that SAM HOUSTON and STEPHEN F. AUSTIN did not intend for our rights as TEXANS to be legislated away by someone who has never been here except for a campaign stop or not at all. THINK ABOUT IT.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)